Paxson v. Haster
This text of 11 N.J.L. 411 (Paxson v. Haster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Court. The plaintiff’s claim is not barred by the discharge of the defendant. Until the plaintiff paid the note, there was not any specific and certain debt due to him from the defendant; and the actual payment of the money was subsequent to the defendant’s discharge. This case is similar to Frost v. Carter, 1 John, cases, 73; in which the reasoning of Kent J. and the cases he cited very satisfactorily sustain the decision which was made.
Judgment for the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 N.J.L. 411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paxson-v-haster-nj-1830.