Paxson v. Haster

11 N.J.L. 411
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMay 15, 1830
StatusPublished

This text of 11 N.J.L. 411 (Paxson v. Haster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Paxson v. Haster, 11 N.J.L. 411 (N.J. 1830).

Opinion

By the Court. The plaintiff’s claim is not barred by the discharge of the defendant. Until the plaintiff paid the note, there was not any specific and certain debt due to him from the defendant; and the actual payment of the money was subsequent to the defendant’s discharge. This case is similar to Frost v. Carter, 1 John, cases, 73; in which the reasoning of Kent J. and the cases he cited very satisfactorily sustain the decision which was made.

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 N.J.L. 411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paxson-v-haster-nj-1830.