Pawnderosa Pawn Shops Inc. v. Conley

2017 Ark. 342

• Court: Supreme Court of Arkansas
• Decided: November 30, 2017
• Docket: CV-17-188
• Status: Published

Opinion

Cite as 2017 Ark. 342 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-17-188

Opinion Delivered: November 30, 2017

PAWNDEROSA PAWN SHOPS, INC., AND PAUL PAKIS APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI APPELLANTS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 60CV-16-3005] V. HONORABLE WENDELL GRIFFEN, HERMAN CONLEY JUDGE APPELLEE REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS TO DECERTIFY THE CLASS.

SHAWN A. WOMACK, Associate Justice

Pawnderosa Pawn Shops, Inc., and Paul Pakis (“Pawnderosa”) appeal the Pulaski

County Circuit Court’s order granting class certification for a group of Pawnderosa’s

customers including Herman Conley. Appellees allege that Pawnderosa’s business practices

violated the anti-usury language of amendment 89 to the Arkansas Constitution and of the

Arkansas Deceptive Trade Practices Act. The circuit court’s order defined the class as “[a]ny

and all persons who have owed, currently owe or will incur debts directly arising out of

pawn transactions with Defendant, Pawnderosa Pawn Shops, Inc. within five years of the

date of this Complaint was filed and continuing up through and until judgment may be

rendered in this matter.” Pawnderosa argues on appeal that the circuit court abused its

discretion in determining that a class exists, in determining that the putative class satisfied the requirements of Arkansas Rule of Civil Procedure 23 (2016), and in refusing to admit

testimony relevant to these issues at the hearing on class certification.

For the reasons expressed in Arch Street Pawn Shop, LLC v. Gunn, 2017 Ark. 341,

handed down this same date, we hold that the circuit court abused its discretion in certifying

the class.

Reversed and remanded with instructions to decertify the class.

Williams & Anderson PLC, by: Heather G. Zachary, Philip E. Kaplan, David M. Powell,

and Alec Gaines, for appellants.

Omavi Shukur, for appellee.