Pawliuk v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
This text of 243 A.D. 798 (Pawliuk v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff sues to recover unpaid balances in total disability benefits under two industrial policies issued by defendant. Judgment and order of the City Court of Yonkers reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide the event. The verdict is against the weight of the credible proof. The substantial evidence, consisting in large part of documents signed by the plaintiff with his mark, shows that the age of the plaintiff was fourteen years greater than that stated in the policy. (Campanaro v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America, 235 App. Div. 702, and cases cited.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Tompkins, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
243 A.D. 798, 278 N.Y.S. 715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pawliuk-v-prudential-insurance-co-of-america-nyappdiv-1935.