Pawliger v. Freer
This text of 421 So. 2d 807 (Pawliger v. Freer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Because we do not discern a gross abuse of discretion by the trial court, Cricket Club, Inc. v. Basso, 384 So.2d 908 (Fla. 3d [808]*808DCA 1980); see B.C. Builders Supply Co. v. Maldonado, 405 So.2d 1345 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), we affirm the denial of the Motion, on Behalf of Sylvan Pawliger, to Set Aside Default Judgment.
We reverse as to Max Pawliger, however, in accordance with the concession by counsel for appellee that proper service was not effected.
Affirmed as to Sylvan Pawliger; reversed as to Max Pawliger, with directions to vacate the default entered against him; and remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
421 So. 2d 807, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pawliger-v-freer-fladistctapp-1982.