Pawley v. Morrall
Opinion
Whereas by an Order of this Court on the 5 th March last, It was Ordered, That the Injunction in this Cause should be Dissolved, unless Cause were this day Shewn to the contrary: Now upon opening the Matter unto this Court by Mr. Rutledge of Counsel for the Defendant It was Moved that the said Injunction might be Dissolved Mr. Graeme 4 of Counsel for the Complainant [391]*391Offered some Reasons for continuing the same, Whereupon and on hearing what was alledged by the Councel on both Sides; It appeared to this Court That the Complainant’s Bill hath not sufficient Equity in it for continuing the Said Injunction; It is therefore Ordered That the Injunction in this Cause be dissolved, and the Bill dismissed out of this Court with Costs of Suit to be paid by the Complainant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 390 (Pawley v. Morrall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.