Pawley v. G. H. G. Building Corp.

9 A.D.2d 890, 194 N.Y.S.2d 110, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5538
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1959·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order granting plaintiffs’ motion for temporary injunction unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, without costs to any party. Special Term held the agreement under which plaintiffs claim the right to maintain their washing machines in defendant’s laundry room to be a lease, and not a license. Even if the agreement is a lease, plaintiffs are not entitled to injunctive relief, there being a complete remedy at law {Knoyef y, [891]*891Atkins, 273 App. Div. 356, 358-359, affd. 298 N. Y. 750). If, as defendant urges, plaintiffs were mere licensees, the remedy at láw is also adequate because damages are readily measurable and admittedly recoverable. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, M. M. Frank, Yalente and Stevens, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pawley v. G. H. G. Building Corp., 9 A.D.2d 890, 194 N.Y.S.2d 110, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5538 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

9 A.D.2d 890 (Pawley v. G. H. G. Building Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Linro Equipment Corp. v. Westage Tower Associates
233 A.D.2d 824 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)