Pavreen Idris v. City of Chicago

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided February 3, 2009·No. 08-1363·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 February 3, 2009

Before

FRANK H. EASTERBROOK , Chief Judge

KENNETH F. RIPPLE , Circuit Judge

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge

No. 08-1363 Appeal from the United PARVEEN IDRIS, et al. , States District Court for the Plaintiffs-Appellants, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division.

v.

No. 06 C 6085 C ITY OF C HICAGO, ILLINOIS, et al., Robert W. Gettleman, Judge.

Defendants-Appellees.

Order

The opinion issued on January 5, 2009, is amended as follows:

1. The sentence at slip op. 2, lines 9-10, which originally read “The district court held otherwise and entered summary judgment for the defendants.”, is changed to: “The district court held otherwise and dismissed the complaint.”

2. The sentence at slip op. 5 lines 19-21, which originally read “The district court dismissed without prejudice all state-law claims, so that plaintiffs may pursue them in state court.”, is changed to: “The district court dismissed without prejudice the claim under state law that Chicago’s program is unauthorized or conflicts with a state statute, so that this line of argument may be renewed in state court.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pavreen Idris v. City of Chicago, (7th Cir. 2009).

Pavreen Idris v. City of Chicago (Pavreen Idris v. City of Chicago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.