Pavreen Idris v. City of Chicago
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 February 3, 2009
Before
FRANK H. EASTERBROOK , Chief Judge
KENNETH F. RIPPLE , Circuit Judge
ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge
No. 08-1363 Appeal from the United PARVEEN IDRIS, et al. , States District Court for the Plaintiffs-Appellants, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division.
v.
No. 06 C 6085 C ITY OF C HICAGO, ILLINOIS, et al., Robert W. Gettleman, Judge.
Defendants-Appellees.
Order
The opinion issued on January 5, 2009, is amended as follows:
1. The sentence at slip op. 2, lines 9-10, which originally read “The district court held otherwise and entered summary judgment for the defendants.”, is changed to: “The district court held otherwise and dismissed the complaint.”
2. The sentence at slip op. 5 lines 19-21, which originally read “The district court dismissed without prejudice all state-law claims, so that plaintiffs may pursue them in state court.”, is changed to: “The district court dismissed without prejudice the claim under state law that Chicago’s program is unauthorized or conflicts with a state statute, so that this line of argument may be renewed in state court.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pavreen Idris v. City of Chicago (Pavreen Idris v. City of Chicago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.