Pavone v. West Islip CVS, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pavone v. West Islip CVS, Inc.

267 A.D.2d 289, 699 N.Y.S.2d 901, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12863

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 13, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 267 A.D.2d 289 (Pavone v. West Islip CVS, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pavone v. West Islip CVS, Inc., 267 A.D.2d 289, 699 N.Y.S.2d 901, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12863 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated October 1, 1998, as granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

The defendant made out a prima face case for summary judgment. In opposition, the plaintiff did not raise any triable issues of fact. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the [290]*290complaint (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557). S. Miller, J. P., O’Brien, McGinity and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated October 1, 1998, as granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

The defendant made out a prima face case for summary judgment. In opposition, the plaintiff did not raise any triable issues of fact. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the [290]*290complaint (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557). S. Miller, J. P., O’Brien, McGinity and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

267 A.D.2d 289, 699 N.Y.S.2d 901, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pavone-v-west-islip-cvs-inc-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack