Pavlovic v. Czajka

27 A.D.3d 983, 810 N.Y.S.2d 687
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 23, 2006·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (initiated in this Court pursuant to CPLR 506 [b] [1]) to review a determination of respondent which revoked petitioner’s pistol permit.

A CPLR article 78 proceeding against a Judge of the Surrogate’s Court should be commenced in Supreme Court and is not properly commenced in this Court (see CPLR 506 [b] [1]; Matter of Panas v Traficanti, 147 AD2d 795, 796 [1989]; Matter of Juracka v Severson, 115 AD2d 102, 102 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 603 [1986]). Neither Matter of Mazzone v Czajka (8 AD3d 788 [2004]) nor Matter of Gerard v Czajka (307 AD2d 633 [2003]) address the issue of lack of initial jurisdiction in this Court and, therefore, they should not be regarded as controlling authority.

Crew III, J.P., Peters, Mugglin, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pavlovic v. Czajka, 27 A.D.3d 983, 810 N.Y.S.2d 687 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

27 A.D.3d 983 (Pavlovic v. Czajka) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

TONAWANDA SENECA NATION v. NOONAN, HON. ROBERT C.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
Tonawanda Seneca Nation v. Noonan
122 A.D.3d 1334 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)