Pavlick Et Ux. v. Zellermeyer

59 A.2d 92, 359 Pa. 278
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 25, 1948·No. Appeal, 122·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearne,

Plaintiffs filed a bill in equity against a living defendant seeking to enforce specifically a written contract for the sale of the fixtures, stock in trade and good will of a restaurant with a liquor license. Pending the suit defendant died and her executors were substituted as defendants. The learned court decreed specific performance. From this decree the appeal is taken.

The decree was correctly entered. See Cochrane v. Szpakowski, 355 Pa. 357, 49 A. 2d 692.

*280 Upon the death of defendant her estate passed into the hands of the law for administration and distribution. The decree thus obtained in the court of common pleas must be presented to the orphans’ court for enforcement: Hammett’s Appeal, 83 Pa. 392; Phillips, Admr., v. The Allegheny Valley Railroad Co., 107 Pa. 465; Strouse v. Lawrence, Administratrix, 160 Pa. 421, 28 A. 930; Thompson’s Estate, 130 Pa. Superior Ct. 263, 197 A. 547. Cf. Fitzsimmons v. Lindsay, 205 Pa. 79, 83, 54 A. 488.

Decree affirmed at cost of appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pavlick Et Ux. v. Zellermeyer, 59 A.2d 92, 359 Pa. 278 (Pa. 1948).

59 A.2d 92 (Pavlick Et Ux. v. Zellermeyer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chaniewicz v. Chaniewicz
257 A.2d 605 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1969)
Pichler v. Snavely
79 A.2d 227 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1951)
Ritz v. Rafail
77 A.2d 411 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1951)