Pavlic Vending Service, Inc. v. United States
This text of 48 Fed. Cl. 842 (Pavlic Vending Service, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Before the court is Plaintiffs Response to Order to Show Cause. Plaintiff argues that this case should not be dismissed “pending the appeal” in a cognate case, A-l Amusement Co., et al. v. United States, 48 Fed.Cl. 63 (2000), in which the court dismissed a claim legally identical to the claim pleaded in Count I in this ease by Opinion and Order dated October 19, 2000.1 Plaintiff challenges the court’s decision in A-l Amusement and urges, in effect, reconsideration of the court’s opinion. Plaintiff declines to address, however, the finality of the judgment in A-l Amusement pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Court of Federal Claims.2
[843]*843Because plaintiff offers no other reason why this case should not be dismissed, the matter of Pavlic Vending Service, Inc. v. United States, No. 98-506 C, is DISMISSED with prejudice.
The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment for defendant.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 Fed. Cl. 842, 2001 U.S. Claims LEXIS 61, 2001 WL 280220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pavlic-vending-service-inc-v-united-states-uscfc-2001.