Pavlak v. Aermotor Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Pavlak v. Aermotor Co.

209 Ill. App. 271

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedDecember 28, 1917

DocketGen. No. 23,168

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 209 Ill. App. 271 (Pavlak v. Aermotor Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pavlak v. Aermotor Co., 209 Ill. App. 271 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Master and servant, § 537*—when declaration does not allege violation of act relating to guarding dangerous tables. Where the allegations of the declaration, in an action to recover damages for injuries sustained while plaintiff was employed in defendant’s manufacturing shop, were limited .to the charge that the table on which plaintiff worked was defective, held that the allegations did not allege a violation of section 1 of the Health, Safety and Comfort Act of July 1, 1915 [Callaghan’s 1916 St. Supp. 5417(1)], providing that all tables in any factory, mercantile establishment, mill or workshop shall be so located wherever possible as not to be dangerous to employees, or shall be properly inclosed, fenced or otherwise protected.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Master and servant, § 537*—when declaration does not allege violation of act relating to guarding dangerous tables. Where the allegations of the declaration, in an action to recover damages for injuries sustained while plaintiff was employed in defendant’s manufacturing shop, were limited .to the charge that the table on which plaintiff worked was defective, held that the allegations did not allege a violation of section 1 of the Health, Safety and Comfort Act of July 1, 1915 [Callaghan’s 1916 St. Supp. 5417(1)], providing that all tables in any factory, mercantile establishment, mill or workshop shall be so located wherever possible as not to be dangerous to employees, or shall be properly inclosed, fenced or otherwise protected.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

209 Ill. App. 271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pavlak-v-aermotor-co-illappct-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack