Pavik v. George & Lynch, Inc.
This text of Pavik v. George & Lynch, Inc. (Pavik v. George & Lynch, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
l The Circle, Suite 2
GEORGETOWN, DE 19947
E. SCOTT BRADLEY JUDGE September 25, 2018
Louis J. Rizzo, Jr., Esquire
D. Miika Roggio, Esquire Silver, McDonald & Friedman Reger Rizzo & Damall LLP 1523 Concord Pike, Suite 200
1010 North Bancroft Parkway, Suite 22 Wilmington, DE 19805 Brandywine Plaza East Wilmington, DE 19803
Joseph R. Fowler, Esquire Fowler Hirtzel McNulty Spaulding 2000 Market Street Suite 550 § Philadelphia, PA 19107 ~=`»` ¢/) '-"6 ¢_'},’ `U N
RE: Pavik v. George & Lynch, Inc. C.A. No. Sl4C-01-006 ESB
CD
Dear Counsel:
l" 5 b _D so C) -~¢ :-`C ca 2
nos xJSsns
h' 0
A.l V.l
I have denied George & Lynch Inc.’s Motion for Reargument of my decision gr:lming'<
summary judgment in favor of E. J. Breneman. George & Lynch Inc.’s motion raises the same arguments that I previously considered and rejected. I am satisfied that my earlier decision
remains correct. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Very truly yours,
E. Scott Bradley
ESB:tll
Prothonotary’s Office
cc: Counsel of Record
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Pavik v. George & Lynch, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pavik-v-george-lynch-inc-delsuperct-2018.