Pavik v. George & Lynch, Inc.

Opinion

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

l The Circle, Suite 2

GEORGETOWN, DE 19947

E. SCOTT BRADLEY JUDGE September 25, 2018

Louis J. Rizzo, Jr., Esquire

D. Miika Roggio, Esquire Silver, McDonald & Friedman Reger Rizzo & Damall LLP 1523 Concord Pike, Suite 200

1010 North Bancroft Parkway, Suite 22 Wilmington, DE 19805 Brandywine Plaza East Wilmington, DE 19803

Joseph R. Fowler, Esquire Fowler Hirtzel McNulty Spaulding 2000 Market Street Suite 550 § Philadelphia, PA 19107 ~=`»` ¢/) '-"6 ¢_'},’ `U N

RE: Pavik v. George & Lynch, Inc. C.A. No. Sl4C-01-006 ESB

CD

Dear Counsel:

l" 5 b _D so C) -~¢ :-`C ca 2

nos xJSsns

h' 0

A.l V.l

I have denied George & Lynch Inc.’s Motion for Reargument of my decision gr:lming'<

summary judgment in favor of E. J. Breneman. George & Lynch Inc.’s motion raises the same arguments that I previously considered and rejected. I am satisfied that my earlier decision

remains correct. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Very truly yours,

E. Scott Bradley

ESB:tll

Prothonotary’s Office

cc: Counsel of Record