Pavia & Co. S. P. A. v. Siegel Chemical Co.
This text of 1 A.D.2d 651 (Pavia & Co. S. P. A. v. Siegel Chemical Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion denied. The parties should be able to stipulate to eliminate from the printed record on appeal such parts of the examinations as are not essential to the questions presented on the appeal. Costs and disbursements may be imposed upon respondents if the printed record on appeal is found to be needlessly extended. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Bastow, Botein and Rabin, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 A.D.2d 651, 149 N.Y.S.2d 697, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pavia-co-s-p-a-v-siegel-chemical-co-nyappdiv-1955.