Pavey v. Pavey

Appellate Court of Illinois

Pavey v. Pavey

103 Ill. App. 589, 1902 Ill. App. LEXIS 188

DecidedSeptember 11, 1902

StatusPublished

This text of 103 Ill. App. 589 (Pavey v. Pavey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pavey v. Pavey, 103 Ill. App. 589, 1902 Ill. App. LEXIS 188 (Ill. Ct. App. 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Worthington

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a suit for divorce brought by defendant in error. A decree was rendered in his favor. The defendant to the suit brings the case to this court by writ of error, and defendant in error having failed to tile his brief, the decree of the Circuit Court is reversed and the bill of defendant in error is dismissed proforma, under rule 29 of this court. An examination of the testimony in the record fails to show any valid reason why rule 29 should not be enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Worthington

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a suit for divorce brought by defendant in error. A decree was rendered in his favor. The defendant to the suit brings the case to this court by writ of error, and defendant in error having failed to tile his brief, the decree of the Circuit Court is reversed and the bill of defendant in error is dismissed proforma, under rule 29 of this court. An examination of the testimony in the record fails to show any valid reason why rule 29 should not be enforced.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

103 Ill. App. 589, 1902 Ill. App. LEXIS 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pavey-v-pavey-illappct-1902.