Pavel C. v. Alinda A.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pavel C. v. Alinda A.

210 A.D.2d 477, 620 N.Y.S.2d 1005

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 27, 1994·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—In a paternity proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Pearce, J.), dated June 16, 1993, which dismissed, without a hearing, the proceeding.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs and disbursements.

[478] The Family Court properly dismissed the proceeding without a hearing, because the blood tests conclusively excluded the possibility of paternity and the authenticity of the test results was not challenged (see, Matter of Thomas F. v Victoria G., 194 AD2d 670). Bracken, J. P., Balletta, Ritter, Pizzuto and ííorio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a paternity proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Pearce, J.), dated June 16, 1993, which dismissed, without a hearing, the proceeding.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs and disbursements.

[478] The Family Court properly dismissed the proceeding without a hearing, because the blood tests conclusively excluded the possibility of paternity and the authenticity of the test results was not challenged (see, Matter of Thomas F. v Victoria G., 194 AD2d 670). Bracken, J. P., Balletta, Ritter, Pizzuto and ííorio, JJ., concur.

Pavel C. v. Alinda A., 210 A.D.2d 477, 620 N.Y.S.2d 1005 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

210 A.D.2d 477 (Pavel C. v. Alinda A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related