Paurice v. Paurice
This text of 35 A.2d 676 (Paurice v. Paurice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this matrimonial cause the wife prevailed and a decree for separate maintenance for her was entered accordingly. The decree also provided that the husband's counter-claim for divorce, based on the wife's alleged desertion, be dismissed. The husband appealed from the decree in all its parts. Our examination of the evidence, which was presented to the learned advisory master, convinces us that the decree advised was in all respects a proper one and it is therefore affirmed.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PORTER, COLIE, DEAR, WELLS, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, DILL, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 A.2d 676, 134 N.J. Eq. 408, 1944 N.J. LEXIS 426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paurice-v-paurice-nj-1944.