Paulowsky v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 14-077V
Filed: August 16, 2018
* * * * * * * * * * * * * JOSEPH PAULOWSKY, * UNPUBLISHED
*
Petitioner, * Decision on Joint Stipulation;
* Shoulder Injury Related to v. * Vaccine Injury (“SIRVA”);
* Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, *
*
Respondent. *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * Mark Sadaka Esq., Mark T. Sadaka, LLC, Englewood, NJ, for petitioner. Lara Englund, Esq., US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1 Roth, Special Master:
On January 27, 2014, Joseph Paulowsky [“Mr. Paulowsky or “petitioner”] filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 Petitioner initially alleged that the influenza (“flu”) vaccine he received on November 1, 2011, caused him to develop a systemic inflammatory response leading to a heart attack and decreased cardiac strength and function. Stipulation, filed August 16, 2018, at ¶¶ 1-4. On February 24, 2017, petitioner filed an
1 Although this Decision has been formally designated “unpublished,” it will nevertheless be posted on the Court of Federal Claims’s website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107- 347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. However, the parties may object to the Decision’s inclusion of certain kinds of confidential information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has fourteen days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the whole Decision will be available to the public. Id. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).
amended petition alleging that the flu vaccine also caused a shoulder injury. Id. at ¶ 4. Respondent denies that the aforementioned immunization caused petitioner’s injuries. Stipulation at ¶ 6.
Nevertheless, the parties have agreed to settle the case. On August 16, 2018, the parties filed a joint stipulation agreeing to settle this case and describing the settlement terms.
Respondent agrees to issue the following payment:
A lump sum of $50,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Joseph Paulowsky. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 300aa-15(a).
I adopt the parties’ stipulation attached hereto, and award compensation in the amount and on the terms set forth therein. The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Mindy Michaels Roth
Mindy Michaels Roth
Special Master
3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
JOSEPH PAULOWSKY, )
)
Petitioner, )
)
v. ) No. 14-77V ) Special Master Mindy Michaels Roth SECRETARY OF ) HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, )
)
Respondent. )
)
STIPULATION
The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:
1. Petitioner Joseph Paulowsky (“petitioner”) filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 to 34 (the “Vaccine Program”). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner’s receipt of the influenza (“flu”) vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3 (a).
2. Petitioner received a flu vaccine on or about November 1, 2011.
3. The vaccine was administered within the United States.
4. Petitioner initially alleged that the flu vaccine caused him to develop a systemic inflammatory response leading to a heart attack and decreased cardiac strength and function. On February 24, 2017, petitioner filed an amended petition alleging that the flu vaccine also caused a shoulder injury. Petitioner alleges that he experienced residual effects of these injuries for more than six months.
5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages as a result of his condition.
6. Respondent denies that the flu vaccine is the cause of petitioner’s alleged inflammatory response, cardiac injury, shoulder injury, or any other injury or his current condition.
7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.
8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue the following vaccine compensation payment:
A lump sum of $50,000.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. §300aa-15(a).
9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and after petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings before the special master to award reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in proceeding upon this petition.
10. Petitioner and his attorney represent that they have identified to respondent all known sources of payment for items or services for which the Program is not primarily liable under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g), including State compensation programs, insurance policies, Federal or State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. § 1396 et seq.)), or entities that provide health services on a pre-paid basis.
11. Payment made pursuant to paragraph 8 and any amounts awarded pursuant to paragraph 9 of this Stipulation will be made in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(i), subject to the availability of sufficient statutory funds.
12. The parties and their attorneys further agree and stipulate that, except for any award for attorneys’ fees and litigation costs and past unreimbursable expenses, the money provided pursuant to this Stipulation will be used solely for the benefit of petitioner as contemplated by a strict construction of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) and (d), and subject to the conditions of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g) and (h).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Paulowsky v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Paulowsky v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.