Paull v. Paull

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Paull v. Paull

131 A.2d 599, 389 Pa. 16, 1957 Pa. LEXIS 334

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 22, 1957

DocketAppeal, No. 46

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 131 A.2d 599 (Paull v. Paull) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Paull v. Paull, 131 A.2d 599, 389 Pa. 16, 1957 Pa. LEXIS 334 (Pa. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The provision in paragraph 3 of the decree appealed from, which imposes a lien of Us pendens on real estate owned by the defendant, Charles T. Pauli, and his wife by the entireties to secure the payments ordered by paragraphs 1 and 2 of the decree to be made by Charles T. Pauli, individually, to Leo L. Pauli, plaintiff, was beyond the power of the court below to decree. Accordingly, paragraph 3 of the decree is hereby declared to be invalid and of no effect.

As so modified, the decree is affirmed at the appellee’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The provision in paragraph 3 of the decree appealed from, which imposes a lien of Us pendens on real estate owned by the defendant, Charles T. Pauli, and his wife by the entireties to secure the payments ordered by paragraphs 1 and 2 of the decree to be made by Charles T. Pauli, individually, to Leo L. Pauli, plaintiff, was beyond the power of the court below to decree. Accordingly, paragraph 3 of the decree is hereby declared to be invalid and of no effect.

As so modified, the decree is affirmed at the appellee’s costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

131 A.2d 599, 389 Pa. 16, 1957 Pa. LEXIS 334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paull-v-paull-pa-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack