Paull v. Paull

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Paull v. Paull

131 A.2d 599, 389 Pa. 16, 1957 Pa. LEXIS 334

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 22, 1957·No. Appeal, No. 46·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The provision in paragraph 3 of the decree appealed from, which imposes a lien of Us pendens on real estate owned by the defendant, Charles T. Pauli, and his wife by the entireties to secure the payments ordered by paragraphs 1 and 2 of the decree to be made by Charles T. Pauli, individually, to Leo L. Pauli, plaintiff, was beyond the power of the court below to decree. Accordingly, paragraph 3 of the decree is hereby declared to be invalid and of no effect.

As so modified, the decree is affirmed at the appellee’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The provision in paragraph 3 of the decree appealed from, which imposes a lien of Us pendens on real estate owned by the defendant, Charles T. Pauli, and his wife by the entireties to secure the payments ordered by paragraphs 1 and 2 of the decree to be made by Charles T. Pauli, individually, to Leo L. Pauli, plaintiff, was beyond the power of the court below to decree. Accordingly, paragraph 3 of the decree is hereby declared to be invalid and of no effect.

As so modified, the decree is affirmed at the appellee’s costs.

Paull v. Paull, 131 A.2d 599, 389 Pa. 16, 1957 Pa. LEXIS 334 (Pa. 1957).

Pincite

131 A.2d 599 (Paull v. Paull) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related