Paulk v. Hawkins

32 S.E. 122, 106 Ga. 206, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 59
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 15, 1898·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Lumpkin, P. J.

It appears in this, case that a petition for certiorari, alleging the commission of errors in a justice’s court, was presented to the judge of the superior court. His refusal to sanction the same is here assigned as error. The bill of exceptions recites that the petition was. not sworn to. Section 4638 of the Civil Code expressly provides that no writ of certiorari shall be granted or issued in such a case, unless the applicant shall make the affidavit- therein provided for. The making of this affidavit is therefore- an indispensable prerequisite to a sanction by the judge.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Paulk v. Hawkins, 32 S.E. 122, 106 Ga. 206, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 59 (Ga. 1898).

32 S.E. 122 (Paulk v. Hawkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beard v. City of Atlanta
86 S.E.2d 672 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)
Hunter v. Harvill
44 S.E.2d 293 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)
Veal v. Veal
166 S.E. 460 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Horton-Hughes Furniture Co. v. Broad Street Hotel Co.
95 S.E. 373 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Willims v. Mangum
46 S.E. 835 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)