Pauling v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Pauling v. State

584 A.2d 69, 321 Md. 641

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedJanuary 18, 1991

DocketNo. 145

StatusPublished

This text of 584 A.2d 69 (Pauling v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pauling v. State, 584 A.2d 69, 321 Md. 641 (Md. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Court having considered and granted the petition for writ of certiorari, it is this 18th day of January, 1991

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals be, and it is hereby, reversed and the case is remanded to the Court of Special Appeals for reconsideration in light of Williams v. State, 321 Md. 266, 582 A.2d 803 (1990). Costs in this Court and in the Court of Special Appeals to be paid by the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Court having considered and granted the petition for writ of certiorari, it is this 18th day of January, 1991

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals be, and it is hereby, reversed and the case is remanded to the Court of Special Appeals for reconsideration in light of Williams v. State, 321 Md. 266, 582 A.2d 803 (1990). Costs in this Court and in the Court of Special Appeals to be paid by the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

584 A.2d 69, 321 Md. 641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pauling-v-state-md-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack