Pauline v. Borer

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pauline v. Borer

253 So. 2d 719, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5912

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 18, 1971

DocketNo. 71-101

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 253 So. 2d 719 (Pauline v. Borer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pauline v. Borer, 253 So. 2d 719, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5912 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

MANN, Judge.

Pauline, as listing broker, was advised by a saleslady for another broker in a multiple listing system that their customer was willing to pay $32,000, or, if necessary, $33,000, for the property of Mr. and Mrs. Staples. Pauline’s saleslady had procured an offer of $30,000 and talked with Staples on the telephone. Pauline picked up the phone and talked with Staples but did not advise him of the higher offer although he knew of it. Staples sent a telegraphed acceptance of the $30,000 offer. These findings are supported by competent substantial evidence and support the suspension of [720]*720Pauline’s license for one year. Pauline had a duty to disclose the higher offer. See Singer v. M. Grant Inc., Fla.App.1963, 151 So.2d 52; Anno., 7 A.L.R.3d 693.

Certiorari denied.

PIERCE, C. J., and McNULTY, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MANN, Judge.

Pauline, as listing broker, was advised by a saleslady for another broker in a multiple listing system that their customer was willing to pay $32,000, or, if necessary, $33,000, for the property of Mr. and Mrs. Staples. Pauline’s saleslady had procured an offer of $30,000 and talked with Staples on the telephone. Pauline picked up the phone and talked with Staples but did not advise him of the higher offer although he knew of it. Staples sent a telegraphed acceptance of the $30,000 offer. These findings are supported by competent substantial evidence and support the suspension of [720]*720Pauline’s license for one year. Pauline had a duty to disclose the higher offer. See Singer v. M. Grant Inc., Fla.App.1963, 151 So.2d 52; Anno., 7 A.L.R.3d 693.

Certiorari denied.

PIERCE, C. J., and McNULTY, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 So. 2d 719, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pauline-v-borer-fladistctapp-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack