Pauli v. Commonwealth
This text of 433 A.2d 161 (Pauli v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
The Common Pleas Court of Allegheny County affirmed the revocation of William D. Pauli’s motor vehicle operating privileges by the Secretary of Transportation. He appeals.
The only issues before us are (1). whether a two-month period between receipt of certification of conviction and notice of revocation is an unreasonable ad[91]*91ministrative delay and (2) was there a resulting prejudice to Pauli. See Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Parr, 56 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 203, 205, 424 A.2d 604, 605 (1981). A two-month period between receipt of certification and notice of revocation is not an unreasonable time prejudicial to Pauli. See Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Lea, 34 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 310, 384 A.2d 269 (1978).
Absent a showing of delay, coupled with prejudice, we will not order the reinstatement of Pauli’s license. In this case, there has been neither delay nor prejudice.
Affirmed.
Order
The order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County is hereby affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
433 A.2d 161, 61 Pa. Commw. 90, 1981 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pauli-v-commonwealth-pacommwct-1981.