Pauli v. Carss

San Fran. Dist Ct

Pauli v. Carss

2 Cal. Dist. Ct. 132

DecidedFebruary 15, 1858

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Cal. Dist. Ct. 132 (Pauli v. Carss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering San Fransisco District Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pauli v. Carss, 2 Cal. Dist. Ct. 132 (sfdistct 1858).

Pincite

Opinion

Hager, J.

— I find- this case with the report of the referee submitted by consent of parties; bnt I am at a loss to determine the point or matter I am called upon to decide. There are no reasons or statements setting forth the grounds relied upon to set aside the report, or as objections to its confirmation. Neither does the brief of defendants with the papers., present the point that is submitted, or that I am called upon to pass upon. There should be something of record to define the motion, and to show upon what it is based. As the case is presented, I can decide nothing. It would be improper to set the report aside, and its confirmation is not asked by the submission.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hager, J.

— I find- this case with the report of the referee submitted by consent of parties; bnt I am at a loss to determine the point or matter I am called upon to decide. There are no reasons or statements setting forth the grounds relied upon to set aside the report, or as objections to its confirmation. Neither does the brief of defendants with the papers., present the point that is submitted, or that I am called upon to pass upon. There should be something of record to define the motion, and to show upon what it is based. As the case is presented, I can decide nothing. It would be improper to set the report aside, and its confirmation is not asked by the submission.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Cal. Dist. Ct. 132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pauli-v-carss-sfdistct-1858.