Paulhus v. Stewart

Indiana Supreme Court

Paulhus v. Stewart

143 N.E.2d 275, 237 Ind. 696, 1957 Ind. LEXIS 303

Indiana Supreme Court·Decided June 19, 1957·No. No. 0-479·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam

The petitioner, appearing pro se, seeks an alternative writ of mandate to compel Russell E. Stewart, Judge of the Circuit Court of Madison County, to show cause, if any, why he should not set a date for hearing of his petition for error coram nobis.

[697] The relief sought relates to a proceeding in an inferior court. No certified copies of pleadings, orders and entries pertaining to the subject matter accompany the petition, hence it does not comply with Rule 2-35 of this court, 1954 Edition. For this reason the petition is dismissed.

Note. — Reported in 143 N. E. 2d 275.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam

The petitioner, appearing pro se, seeks an alternative writ of mandate to compel Russell E. Stewart, Judge of the Circuit Court of Madison County, to show cause, if any, why he should not set a date for hearing of his petition for error coram nobis.

[697] The relief sought relates to a proceeding in an inferior court. No certified copies of pleadings, orders and entries pertaining to the subject matter accompany the petition, hence it does not comply with Rule 2-35 of this court, 1954 Edition. For this reason the petition is dismissed.

Note. — Reported in 143 N. E. 2d 275.

Paulhus v. Stewart, 143 N.E.2d 275, 237 Ind. 696, 1957 Ind. LEXIS 303 (Ind. 1957).

Pincite

143 N.E.2d 275 (Paulhus v. Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related