Pauley v. State
This text of 287 S.W.2d 489 (Pauley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The conviction is for violation of the liquor law; the punishment, a fine of $250.
In the absence of a bond or recognizance on appeal, or a showing that appellant is in jail, we are without jurisdiction of this misdemeanor appeal. Braun v. State, 158 Tex.Cr.R. 394, 257 S.W.2d 708; Alexander v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 269 S.W.2d 682; Warren v. State,Tex.Cr.App., 269 S.W.2d 682.
The appeal is dismissed.
Opinion approved by the Court.
On Motion to Reinstate Appeal
PER CURIAM.
At a former date, this appeal was dismissed because of the absence of a bond or recognizance or a showing that appellant was in jail.
A proper appeal bond has been filed.''.
Thg appeal ⅛ reinstáted; and the case ⅛ 1 * £ ' ' ; . ”
The record contains no statement of facts of bills of exception, and nothing is presented for review.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
287 S.W.2d 489, 1956 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2042, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pauley-v-state-texcrimapp-1956.