Pauley v. State

287 S.W.2d 489, 1956 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2042
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 18, 1956·No. No. 27961·Published

Opinions

DICE, Commissioner.

The conviction is for violation of the liquor law; the punishment, a fine of $250.

In the absence of a bond or recognizance on appeal, or a showing that appellant is in jail, we are without jurisdiction of this misdemeanor appeal. Braun v. State, 158 Tex.Cr.R. 394, 257 S.W.2d 708; Alexander v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 269 S.W.2d 682; Warren v. State,Tex.Cr.App., 269 S.W.2d 682.

The appeal is dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

On Motion to Reinstate Appeal

PER CURIAM.

At a former date, this appeal was dismissed because of the absence of a bond or recognizance or a showing that appellant was in jail.

A proper appeal bond has been filed.''.

Thg appeal ⅛ reinstáted; and the case ⅛ 1 * £ ' ' ; . ”

The record contains no statement of facts of bills of exception, and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pauley v. State, 287 S.W.2d 489, 1956 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2042 (Tex. 1956).

287 S.W.2d 489 (Pauley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alexander v. State
269 S.W.2d 682 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1954)
Braun v. State
257 S.W.2d 708 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1953)
Braun v. State
257 S.W.2d 708 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1953)
Warren v. State
269 S.W.2d 682 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1954)