Pauley v. King-Richardson Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Pauley v. King-Richardson Co.

174 Ill. App. 557, 1912 Ill. App. LEXIS 342

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedDecember 5, 1912

DocketGen. No. 18,536

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 174 Ill. App. 557 (Pauley v. King-Richardson Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pauley v. King-Richardson Co., 174 Ill. App. 557, 1912 Ill. App. LEXIS 342 (Ill. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a case of the fourth class in the Municipal Court, in which appellant suffered a judgment upon trial by a jury for $159.89, on the 16th. day of March, 1912. No stenographic report or statement of facts was presented to the court or filed within thirty days from the date judgment was entered, nor was any order entered within said time extending the time to present the same. A document called a bill of exceptions was filed May 2, 1912.

The defendant in error has moved this court to strike the so-called bill of exceptions or stenographic report from the record, which motion will be allowed.

The errors assigned do not involve matters contained in the common law record, and as we are not at liberty to consider any other errors assigned, the judgment of the Municipal Court is affirmed, following Devine v. Prudential Ins. Co., 156 Ill. App. 477.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI