Paulette v. Sheriff
This text of 517 P.2d 786 (Paulette v. Sheriff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
Indicted for two counts of murder (NRS 200.010) by the Clark County Grand Jury, appellant sought pretrial habeas relief in the district court. In this appeal from the order denying that relief, he contends (1) he is not subject to prosecution in this state because he is a foreign national; and, (2) the evidence submitted to the grand jury was insufficient to establish probable cause.
Appellant is one of three foreign nationals charged, on the same evidence in a single indictment, with the identical crimes.
One of the co-defendants, Claude Theriault, previously raised the identical issues now raised by Paulette, which we considered and rejected, as being without merit, in Theriault v. [3]*3Sheriff, 89 Nev. 506, 515 P.2d 397 (1973).1 The other co-defendant, Robert Gordon Johnstone, also challenged the indictment on the lack of probable cause. We considered and rejected that contention in Johnstone v. Lamb, 89 Nev. 38, 505 P.2d 596 (1973).
The order of the trial court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
517 P.2d 786, 90 Nev. 2, 1974 Nev. LEXIS 292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paulette-v-sheriff-nev-1974.