Paulette Stenzel v. Best Buy Company Inc

Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided January 17, 2017·No. 328804·Published

Opinion

Court of Appeals, State of Michigan

ORDER Michael J. Talbot, C.J. Stenzel v Best Buy Co, Inc. Presiding Judge

Docket No . 328804 All Court of Appeals Judges LC No. 14-000527-NO

The Court orders that a special panel shall be convened pursuant to MCR 7.215(1) to resolve the conflict between this case and Williams v Arbor Home, Inc, 254 Mich App 439; 656 NW2d 873 (2002), vacated in part on other grounds 469 Mich 898 (2003).

The Court further orders that pa1t II(C) of the opm1on m this case, released on December 22, 2016, is vacated in its entirety. MCR 7.215(J)(5).

Appellant may file a supplemental brief within 21 days of the Clerk's certification of this order. Appellees may file a supplemental brief within 21 days of the service of appellant's brief.

A true copy entered and certified by Jerome W. Zimmer Jr., Chief Clerk, on

JAN 1 7 2017 Date

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Paulette Stenzel v. Best Buy Company Inc, (Mich. Ct. App. 2017).

Paulette Stenzel v. Best Buy Company Inc (Paulette Stenzel v. Best Buy Company Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. Arbor Home, Inc
656 N.W.2d 873 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 2003)