Paulette Stenzel v. Best Buy Company Inc
This text of Paulette Stenzel v. Best Buy Company Inc (Paulette Stenzel v. Best Buy Company Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals, State of Michigan
ORDER Michael J. Talbot, C.J. Stenzel v Best Buy Co, Inc. Presiding Judge
Docket No . 328804 All Court of Appeals Judges LC No. 14-000527-NO
The Court orders that a special panel shall be convened pursuant to MCR 7.215(1) to resolve the conflict between this case and Williams v Arbor Home, Inc, 254 Mich App 439; 656 NW2d 873 (2002), vacated in part on other grounds 469 Mich 898 (2003).
The Court further orders that pa1t II(C) of the opm1on m this case, released on December 22, 2016, is vacated in its entirety. MCR 7.215(J)(5).
Appellant may file a supplemental brief within 21 days of the Clerk's certification of this order. Appellees may file a supplemental brief within 21 days of the service of appellant's brief.
A true copy entered and certified by Jerome W. Zimmer Jr., Chief Clerk, on
JAN 1 7 2017 Date
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Paulette Stenzel v. Best Buy Company Inc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paulette-stenzel-v-best-buy-company-inc-michctapp-2017.