Pauler v. Pauler

Appellate Court of Illinois

Pauler v. Pauler

180 Ill. App. 322, 1913 Ill. App. LEXIS 777

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedMay 9, 1913

DocketGen. No. 18,171

StatusPublished

This text of 180 Ill. App. 322 (Pauler v. Pauler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pauler v. Pauler, 180 Ill. App. 322, 1913 Ill. App. LEXIS 777 (Ill. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice F. A. Smith

delivered the opinion of the court.

This appeal is prosecuted from a decree granting appellee a divorce from appellant for extreme and repeated cruelty. The main contention of appellant is that the evidence does not sustain the averments of the bill. Upon an examination of the evidence we are of the opinion that the evidence sustains the bill and the findings of the decree. No useful purpose would be subserved by restating the evidence on the charges of cruelty contained in the bill and we, therefore, omit any detailed discussion of it.

The evidence does not show condonation of the acts of physical cruelty constituting the body of the charge. Sharp v. Sharp, 116 Ill. 509.

The decree is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice F. A. Smith

delivered the opinion of the court.

This appeal is prosecuted from a decree granting appellee a divorce from appellant for extreme and repeated cruelty. The main contention of appellant is that the evidence does not sustain the averments of the bill. Upon an examination of the evidence we are of the opinion that the evidence sustains the bill and the findings of the decree. No useful purpose would be subserved by restating the evidence on the charges of cruelty contained in the bill and we, therefore, omit any detailed discussion of it.

The evidence does not show condonation of the acts of physical cruelty constituting the body of the charge. Sharp v. Sharp, 116 Ill. 509.

The decree is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

180 Ill. App. 322, 1913 Ill. App. LEXIS 777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pauler-v-pauler-illappct-1913.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack