Pauldo v. State

115 S.E. 668, 29 Ga. App. 389, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 22
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 11, 1923·No. 14077·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

Under the ruling in Johnson v. State, 63 Ga. 356, and in Dorsey v. State, 108 Ga. 477 (34 S. E. 135), the evidence in the case at bar did not authorize a conviction for the offense of an assault with intent to rape, and the court erred in overruling the motion for' a new trial. Judgment reversed.

.Luke and Bloodioorth, J.J., concur. W. A. Dampier, T. P. Stephens, for plaintiff in error. P. L. Stephens, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pauldo v. State, 115 S.E. 668, 29 Ga. App. 389, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 22 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

115 S.E. 668 (Pauldo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harper v. State
40 S.E.2d 222 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1946)
Parker v. State
72 Ga. App. 302 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1945)
Grant v. State
27 S.E.2d 106 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1943)
Pickett v. State
186 S.E. 206 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Green v. State
156 S.E. 637 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Little v. State
155 S.E. 352 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)