Paulding v. Lane

55 Misc. 37, 104 N.Y.S. 1051
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJune 15, 1907
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 55 Misc. 37 (Paulding v. Lane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Paulding v. Lane, 55 Misc. 37, 104 N.Y.S. 1051 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1907).

Opinion

Tompkins, J.

Baseball playing on Sunday, to which the public are invited, is prohibited by section 265 of the Penal Code and is a misdemeanor, whether an admission fee is charged or not.

The Legislature, in the exercise of its undoubted power, having forbidden the holding of public games and sports on that day — the question is, not whether the law is wise or unwise, reasonable or unreasonable — the statute is plain [38]*38and, while it remains, the law must be observed and enforced.

Some judges have differed as to whether the charging of an admission fee is necessary to bring the game within the prohibition of the statute. In my opinion it is immaterial whether a charge is made or not. The purpose of the law is to preserve the quiet and repose of the community and the sanctity of the Sabbath; and it matters not whether an admission fee is charged or not, so long as the game is open to the public and likely to attract a considerable number of people. In fact a game to which no admission is charged is likely to draw a larger and more noisy crowd than a game that is limited to those who pay for the privilege of witnessing it.

It is the right and duty of the sheriff as a peace officer to arrest any and all persons who may be engaged, in his presence, in playing such a game.

Courts of equity will not interfere to prevent the enforcement of the criminal law.

Motion for an injunction pendente lite is denied, with ten dollars costs. . • -

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Ebbets
36 N.Y. Crim. 117 (New York Court of Special Session, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 Misc. 37, 104 N.Y.S. 1051, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paulding-v-lane-nysupct-1907.