Paulcin v. State

941 So. 2d 421, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 15963, 2006 WL 2805207
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 3, 2006
DocketNo. 1D06-3658
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 941 So. 2d 421 (Paulcin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Paulcin v. State, 941 So. 2d 421, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 15963, 2006 WL 2805207 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner is the defendant in a criminal case pending in the circuit court and seeks review of certain interlocutory orders. These orders are reviewable on plenary appeal after imposition of judgment and sentence. Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari and/or prohibition is denied. See Mingle v. State, 429 So.2d 850 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).

PETITION DENIED.

ERVIN and POLSTON, JJ., concur; HAWKES, J., concurs in result only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carnival Corp. v. Middleton
941 So. 2d 421 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
941 So. 2d 421, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 15963, 2006 WL 2805207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paulcin-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.