Paul Walde v. Sharon Keri
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit
No. 24-11631
Non-Argument Calendar
PAUL WALDE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus SHARON KERI, Process Manager, JOHN DOE, Unnamed defendant person of DMV over see license suspension, PERSON OF DMV DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES,
Defendants-Appellees.
2 Opinion of the Court 24-11631
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 4:23-cv-00412-RH-MAF
Before ROSENBAUM, GRANT, and LUCK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction . Paul Walde, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s February 26, 2024 final order and judgment. The statutory time limit required him to file a notice of appeal on or before April 11, 2024, 30 days after the district court’s March 12, 2024 order denying his timely motion to reconsider the final order. See 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a); Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). However, he did not file his instant notice of appeal until May 20, 2024, and thus, it cannot invoke our jurisdiction. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Hamer v. Neighborhood Hous. Servs. of Chi., 138 S. Ct. 13, 21 (2017).
No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Paul Walde v. Sharon Keri (Paul Walde v. Sharon Keri) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.