Paul v. Westinghouse, Church, Kerr & Co.
This text of 127 A.D. 926 (Paul v. Westinghouse, Church, Kerr & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, on the ground that the court erred in its refusal to charge that Adler was not a fellow-servant, and that his negligence would not suffice to enable the plaintiff to recover. Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor and-Miller, JJ., concurred; Bich, J., dissented.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
127 A.D. 926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-v-westinghouse-church-kerr-co-nyappdiv-1908.