Paul v. State

211 S.W.3d 168, 2007 WL 49642

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 9, 2007·No. WD 66449·Published

Opinion

211 S.W.3d 168 (2007)

Artis PAUL, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 66449.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

January 9, 2007.

Susan Lynn Hogan, Appellate Defender Office, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Shaun Mackelprang and Evan Buchheim, Office of Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Presiding Judge, PAUL M. SPINDEN, Judge, and LISA WHITE HARDWICK, Judge.

ORDER

Artis Paul appeals the circuit court's judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

211 S.W.3d 168 (2007)

Artis PAUL, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 66449.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

January 9, 2007.

Susan Lynn Hogan, Appellate Defender Office, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Shaun Mackelprang and Evan Buchheim, Office of Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Presiding Judge, PAUL M. SPINDEN, Judge, and LISA WHITE HARDWICK, Judge.

ORDER

Artis Paul appeals the circuit court's judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Paul v. State, 211 S.W.3d 168, 2007 WL 49642 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

211 S.W.3d 168 (Paul v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.