Paul v. State

544 S.E.2d 164, 246 Ga. App. 886, 2001 Fulton County D. Rep. 159, 2000 Ga. App. LEXIS 1396
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Paul v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 240 Ga. App. 699
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 22, 2000·No. A99A2502·Published

Opinion

Mikell, Judge.

In Paul v. State, 240 Ga. App. 699 (524 SE2d 549) (1999), we affirmed Larry Marion Paul’s conviction of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and possession of a knife during the commission of certain crimes. On certiorari, the Supreme Court reversed Paul’s conviction and granted him a new trial, holding that the trial judge expressed an opinion of Paul’s guilt in violation of OCGA § 17-8-57. Paul v. State, 272 Ga. 845 (537 SE2d 58) (2000). The Supreme Court held that even though Paul waived the error because he failed to object or move for a mistrial, the plain error rule applied, and the trial judge’s OCGA § 17-8-57 violation seriously affected the fairness of the trial. Accordingly, our prior opinion is vacated, and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court.

Judgment reversed.

Johnson, C. J., and Phipps, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Paul v. State, 544 S.E.2d 164, 246 Ga. App. 886, 2001 Fulton County D. Rep. 159, 2000 Ga. App. LEXIS 1396 (Ga. Ct. App. 2000).

544 S.E.2d 164 (Paul v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Paul v. State
524 S.E.2d 549 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2000)
Paul v. State
537 S.E.2d 58 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2000)