Paul v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Paul v. State

84 So. 3d 376, 2012 WL 832642, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4122

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 14, 2012

DocketNo. 4D10-2955

StatusPublished

This text of 84 So. 3d 376 (Paul v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Paul v. State, 84 So. 3d 376, 2012 WL 832642, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4122 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Willard Paul appeals the summary denial of an amended rule 3.850 motion. Although the final order did not specifically address each of Paul’s claims, the order dismissing his original 3.850 motion explained why each of the claims was insufficient, and Paul did not cure the deficiencies in his amended motion. Because his claims are facially insufficient and without merit, we affirm.

GROSS, HAZOURI and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Willard Paul appeals the summary denial of an amended rule 3.850 motion. Although the final order did not specifically address each of Paul’s claims, the order dismissing his original 3.850 motion explained why each of the claims was insufficient, and Paul did not cure the deficiencies in his amended motion. Because his claims are facially insufficient and without merit, we affirm.

GROSS, HAZOURI and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 So. 3d 376, 2012 WL 832642, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.