Paul v. State

630 So. 2d 212, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 13195, 1993 WL 530891
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 21, 1993
DocketNo. 93-2809
StatusPublished

This text of 630 So. 2d 212 (Paul v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Paul v. State, 630 So. 2d 212, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 13195, 1993 WL 530891 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We summarily deny Paul’s petition because in collateral habeas corpus proceedings, as in postconviction proceedings, under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, successive petitions for the same relief are not cognizable. Francois v. Wainwright, 470 So.2d 685, 686 (Fla.1985); Xiques v. Dugger, 571 So.2d 3 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Xiques v. Dugger
571 So. 2d 3 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Francois v. Wainwright
470 So. 2d 685 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
630 So. 2d 212, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 13195, 1993 WL 530891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.