Paul v. South Carolina Department of Transportation

599 F. App'x 108
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 8, 2015
DocketNo. 14-2146
StatusPublished

This text of 599 F. App'x 108 (Paul v. South Carolina Department of Transportation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Paul v. South Carolina Department of Transportation, 599 F. App'x 108 (4th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronald I. Paul appeals the district court’s orders adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action without prejudice, and denying his motion to reconsider and amend. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Paul v. S.C. Dep’t of Transp., No. 3:13-cv01852-CMC, 2014 WL 5025815 (D.S.C. Oct. 8 & 22, 2014). We deny Paul’s motion for summary reversal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
599 F. App'x 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-v-south-carolina-department-of-transportation-ca4-2015.