Paul v. South Carolina Department of Transportation
This text of 599 F. App'x 108 (Paul v. South Carolina Department of Transportation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Ronald I. Paul appeals the district court’s orders adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action without prejudice, and denying his motion to reconsider and amend. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Paul v. S.C. Dep’t of Transp., No. 3:13-cv01852-CMC, 2014 WL 5025815 (D.S.C. Oct. 8 & 22, 2014). We deny Paul’s motion for summary reversal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
599 F. App'x 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-v-south-carolina-department-of-transportation-ca4-2015.