Paul v. Paul

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Paul v. Paul

72 Pa. Super. 70, 1919 Pa. Super. LEXIS 251

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 17, 1919·No. Appeal, No. 162·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The decree from which this appeal is taken is supported by the report of a master who very carefully considered the testimony adduced before him, and recommended that the libelant should be refused a divorce, etc., [73]*73followed by a close scrutiny of all the testimony by the court below; dismissal of the exceptions filed-to the master’s report and affirming his recommendation in refusing a divorce. We have examined the whole record and concur in the conclusion reached.

The decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The decree from which this appeal is taken is supported by the report of a master who very carefully considered the testimony adduced before him, and recommended that the libelant should be refused a divorce, etc., [73]*73followed by a close scrutiny of all the testimony by the court below; dismissal of the exceptions filed-to the master’s report and affirming his recommendation in refusing a divorce. We have examined the whole record and concur in the conclusion reached.

The decree is affirmed.

Paul v. Paul, 72 Pa. Super. 70, 1919 Pa. Super. LEXIS 251 (Pa. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

72 Pa. Super. 70 (Paul v. Paul) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related