Paul v. Paul

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Paul v. Paul

8 Ky. Op. 810, 1876 Ky. LEXIS 277

DecidedDecember 1, 1876

StatusPublished

This text of 8 Ky. Op. 810 (Paul v. Paul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Paul v. Paul, 8 Ky. Op. 810, 1876 Ky. LEXIS 277 (Ky. Ct. App. 1876).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Elliott :

From the pleadings and proof in this cause it appears that at the bringing of this suit and at this time Thomas W. Paul, one of the appellants, was and is a lunatic, and that before this suit was brought he had been found to be of unsound mind and sent to the lunatic asylum at Lexington, Ky., where he has been confined ever since, and there is no evidence in this record either that he has been served with process or that a committee or guardian was appointed in the court below to defend for him, and consequently it was error to render judgment against him.

Sec. 60, Civil Code, declares that no judgment can be rendered against a person of unsound mind till after defense either by committee or guardian ad litem, appointed by the court, and that the appointment of his guardian to defend shall not be made till after the service of the summons in the action as required by the code. For this error alone the judgment is reversed, and cause remanded with [811]*811instructions to bring Thomas W. Paul before the court, and for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Porter & Wallace, for appellants. Marshall & McLeod, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Judge Elliott :

From the pleadings and proof in this cause it appears that at the bringing of this suit and at this time Thomas W. Paul, one of the appellants, was and is a lunatic, and that before this suit was brought he had been found to be of unsound mind and sent to the lunatic asylum at Lexington, Ky., where he has been confined ever since, and there is no evidence in this record either that he has been served with process or that a committee or guardian was appointed in the court below to defend for him, and consequently it was error to render judgment against him.

Sec. 60, Civil Code, declares that no judgment can be rendered against a person of unsound mind till after defense either by committee or guardian ad litem, appointed by the court, and that the appointment of his guardian to defend shall not be made till after the service of the summons in the action as required by the code. For this error alone the judgment is reversed, and cause remanded with [811]*811instructions to bring Thomas W. Paul before the court, and for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Porter & Wallace, for appellants. Marshall & McLeod, for appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 Ky. Op. 810, 1876 Ky. LEXIS 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-v-paul-kyctapp-1876.