Paul v. Paul

245 P. 1022, 121 Kan. 363, 46 A.L.R. 1197, 1926 Kan. LEXIS 96
Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided June 18, 1926·No. No. 26,684·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

A motion for a rehearing is overruled, but these modifications are made in the opinion: The direction accompanying the reversal is changed from “with directions torender judgment for the plaintiff” to read “with directions to overrule the demurrer to the petition.” In a clause used in stating the contentions of the appellee with respect to the effect of the order for the payment of suit money, the words, “not having been embodied in the final judgment it ceased to be effective,” are changed to read: “Not having been embodied in the final judgment it was not entitled to recognition as a judgment of a foreign state under the full faith and credit clause of the federal constitution.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Paul v. Paul, 245 P. 1022, 121 Kan. 363, 46 A.L.R. 1197, 1926 Kan. LEXIS 96 (kan 1926).

245 P. 1022 (Paul v. Paul) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Edwards v. Edwards
324 P.2d 150 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1958)
Goetz v. Goetz
309 P.2d 655 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1957)
Tolley v. Tolley
194 S.W.2d 687 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1946)
Weldy v. Weldy
20 N.W.2d 583 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1945)
Sharp v. Sharp
117 P.2d 561 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1941)
Boyer v. Andrews
196 So. 825 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)
Ogg v. Ogg
267 P. 977 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1928)