Paul v. New York City Transit Authority

244 A.D.2d 322, 665 N.Y.S.2d 535, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11019
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 3, 1997·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.), dated September 30, 1996, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendant summary judgment, as the record contained no evidence from which one could conclude that the defendant had actual or constructive notice of the allegedly defective condition which allegedly caused the plaintiffs fall (see, Piacquadio v Recine Realty Corp., 84 NY2d 967; Gordon v American Museum of Natural History, 67 NY2d 836, 837; Rosario v New York City Tr. Auth., 215 AD2d 364). Rosenblatt, J. P., Thompson, Friedmann and Gold-stein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Paul v. New York City Transit Authority, 244 A.D.2d 322, 665 N.Y.S.2d 535, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11019 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

244 A.D.2d 322 (Paul v. New York City Transit Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McKain v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority
274 A.D.2d 504 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Doobovoy v. New York City Transit Authority
259 A.D.2d 590 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)