Paul v. Instituto Argentino De Promocion Del Intercambio
Opinion
We hold that plaintiffs have satisfied the requirement of notice imposed upon them by Argentine law (Code of Commerce, art. 473). It is unnecessary, therefore, to determine whether enforcement of article 472 of the Argentine Code would be repugnant to the public policy of this State (see Loucks v. Standard Oil Co., 224 N. Y. 99, 111). The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Lottghban, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Bromley, JJ., concur.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
87 N.E.2d 682 (Paul v. Instituto Argentino De Promocion Del Intercambio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.