Paul v. Instituto Argentino De Promocion Del Intercambio

87 N.E.2d 682, 299 N.Y. 786, 1949 N.Y. LEXIS 1200
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 19, 1949·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We hold that plaintiffs have satisfied the requirement of notice imposed upon them by Argentine law (Code of Commerce, art. 473). It is unnecessary, therefore, to determine whether enforcement of article 472 of the Argentine Code would be repugnant to the public policy of this State (see Loucks v. Standard Oil Co., 224 N. Y. 99, 111). The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Lottghban, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Bromley, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Paul v. Instituto Argentino De Promocion Del Intercambio, 87 N.E.2d 682, 299 N.Y. 786, 1949 N.Y. LEXIS 1200 (N.Y. 1949).

87 N.E.2d 682 (Paul v. Instituto Argentino De Promocion Del Intercambio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Loucks v. . Standard Oil Co.
120 N.E. 198 (New York Court of Appeals, 1918)