Paul v. Greyhound Bus Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Paul v. Greyhound Bus Corp.

25 A.D.2d 527, 269 N.Y.S.2d 375, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5030

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 7, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 25 A.D.2d 527 (Paul v. Greyhound Bus Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Paul v. Greyhound Bus Corp., 25 A.D.2d 527, 269 N.Y.S.2d 375, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5030 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

In a consolidated negligence action to recover damages for personal injury, loss of services, etc., defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered October 25, 1965, after pretrial conferences, which directed that the action be preferred for trial pursuant to rule 8 of the Kings County Supreme Court Rules. Order reversed, without costs, and preference vacated. In our opinion, the record does not contain sufficient evidence to show that defendants, at the pretrial hearing, acted arbitrarily and not in good faith with respect to settlement of the action (Wolff v. Laverne, Inc., 17 A D 2d 213). Motion by appellants for a stay, pending appeal from order, dismissed as academic.

Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a consolidated negligence action to recover damages for personal injury, loss of services, etc., defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered October 25, 1965, after pretrial conferences, which directed that the action be preferred for trial pursuant to rule 8 of the Kings County Supreme Court Rules. Order reversed, without costs, and preference vacated. In our opinion, the record does not contain sufficient evidence to show that defendants, at the pretrial hearing, acted arbitrarily and not in good faith with respect to settlement of the action (Wolff v. Laverne, Inc., 17 A D 2d 213). Motion by appellants for a stay, pending appeal from order, dismissed as academic.

Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 A.D.2d 527, 269 N.Y.S.2d 375, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5030, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-v-greyhound-bus-corp-nyappdiv-1966.