Paul v. Florida Cities Bus Co.

198 So. 211, 144 Fla. 599, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1101
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 25, 1940
StatusPublished

This text of 198 So. 211 (Paul v. Florida Cities Bus Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Paul v. Florida Cities Bus Co., 198 So. 211, 144 Fla. 599, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1101 (Fla. 1940).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this cause Mr. Chief Justice Terrell, Mr. Justice Buford, an'd Mr. Justice Thomas are of the opinion that the judgment in this cause should be affirmed, while Mr. Justice Wfiitfield, Mr. Justice Brown, and Mr. Justice Cpiapman are of the opinion that the said judgment should be reversed. When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the judgment should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the decree should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered, and adjudged under the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. 51, that *600 the judgment of the Circuit Court in' this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., Whitfield, Brown, Buford, Chapman and Thomas, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung
47 Fla. 224 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1904)
Griffith v. Alcocke
37 So. 47 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
198 So. 211, 144 Fla. 599, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-v-florida-cities-bus-co-fla-1940.