Paul v. Degenhart v. SCBT, a South Carolina state chartered etc. etal

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Paul v. Degenhart v. SCBT, a South Carolina state chartered etc. etal

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 25, 2015

Docket14-3374

StatusPublished

This text of Paul v. Degenhart v. SCBT, a South Carolina state chartered etc. etal (Paul v. Degenhart v. SCBT, a South Carolina state chartered etc. etal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Paul v. Degenhart v. SCBT, a South Carolina state chartered etc. etal, (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

PAUL V. DEGENHART, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D14-3374

SCBT, A SOUTH CAROLINA STATE CHARTERED BANKING CORPORATION D/B/A FIRST FEDERAL, A DIVISION OF SCBT.

Appellee.

_____________________________/

Opinion filed February 12, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Virginia Norton, Judge.

Paul V. Degenhart, pro se, Appellant.

E. Robert Meek of Foley & Lardner LLP, Jacksonville; James A. McKee and Benjamin J. Grossman of Foley & Lardner, Tallahassee; and Harrison Wesley Poole of Poole & Poole, P.A., Fernandina Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, C.J., WOLF and ROBERTS, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI