Paul v. Consolidated Fireworks Co. of America
148 A.D. 927, 132 N.Y.S. 1149
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Paul v. Consolidated Fireworks Co. of America. Read the opinion of the Court — 133 A.D. 310 →
Opinion
— Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr and Rich, JJ., concurred; Woodward, J., dissented.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Paul v. Consolidated Fireworks Co. of America, 148 A.D. 927, 132 N.Y.S. 1149 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).
148 A.D. 927 (Paul v. Consolidated Fireworks Co. of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.