Paul v. City of Miami Beach
This text of 519 So. 2d 1150 (Paul v. City of Miami Beach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
David PAUL, Appellant,
v.
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Florida, and Joseph Z. Fleming, Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Fine, Jacobson, Schwartz, Nash, Block & England, Miami, for appellant.
Arnold Weiner, City Atty., Miami Beach, Fleming and Klink, Miami, for appellees.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY and NESBITT, JJ.
ON MOTION TO DISMISS
SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.
The operative facts and controlling issue in this case are identical to those in Johnson v. Citizens State Bank, 518 So.2d 410 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). For the reasons stated in Johnson, we follow that decision in holding that an improvidently taken appeal from a judgment of the circuit court sitting in its review capacity may not be effectively treated as an appropriate petition for writ of certiorari when the notice of appeal is not transmitted to the appellate court where certiorari must be initiated within thirty days of the rendition of the lower court order sought to be reviewed. In sum, the appeal does not lie; if considered as a petition for certiorari, it is untimely. Since that is what occurred in the instant case, the motion to dismiss must be granted. We certify to the supreme court the question stated in Johnson.
Appeal dismissed, question certified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
519 So. 2d 1150, 1988 WL 10429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-v-city-of-miami-beach-fladistctapp-1988.